Forum Search
Member Spotlight
Posts: 147
Joined: August 2021
Forum Statistics
Forums31
Topics8,364
Posts56,564
Members992
Most Online4,295
May 22nd, 2026
Top Posters
Pilgrim 15,037
Tom 4,893
chestnutmare 3,466
J_Edwards 2,615
John_C 1,906
Wes 1,856
RJ_ 1,583
MarieP 1,579
Robin 1,080
Top Posters(30 Days)
Pilgrim 35
Tom 4
John_C 2
Robin 1
Recent Posts
"The king also himself passed over the brook Kidron."
by Pilgrim - Sun May 31, 2026 5:53 AM
"Take us the foxes, the little foxes that spoil the vines."
by Pilgrim - Sat May 30, 2026 5:23 AM
"Thou hatest wickedness."
by Pilgrim - Fri May 29, 2026 5:16 AM
"Whom He justified, them He also glorified."
by Pilgrim - Thu May 28, 2026 6:27 AM
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Hop To
#30349 Thu Jan 05, 2006 1:45 AM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 84
Member
OP Offline
Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 84
Hi All,

So, I've been reading a little about this "Emergent" movement or church and post-modernity or post-modernism, and one thing struck me. At least some post-modernist seem to be against this adversarial relationship of things like "knowledge and ignorance" or "dark and light" or whatever, but I've noticed that in this discussion it seems that there's only 2 sides, either "you're post-modernist or not" or "you're modernist or post-modernist", seems kind of two sided, and as my title suggest, I wondering about what I would guess must be the other (3rd)side, pre-modernity. I checked out that oft critized "wikipedia" site and my own dictionary (which has nothing because it's really old).

I just want to know the standard stuff you'd know about any position, who holds it, what defines it (beyond being whatever modernist and postmodernist are not) and why it's so disagreeable to post-modernist? I've heard a couple of professors at my school suggest that we can look at the pre-modern period (middle ages (please don't use that term "Dark Ages")) as Europe with God and the "Enlightenment" as Europe without God, so if the pre-modern period includes God, why doesn't anyone seem to argue for this? Do people just not like terms with "pre" as a prefix because it implies something hasn't arrived yet?

Whatever you can give me, it's appreciated.

-Brother Luke

P. S. Please don't waste my time telling me about the evils of Emergent or demonizing "POMO's", that's not what I'm asking about and I dare say that I am just as able as many of you of working through the issue myself (if I haven't already).

BrimstonePreacha #30350 Thu Jan 05, 2006 2:32 AM
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,615
Needs to get a Life
Offline
Needs to get a Life
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,615
You may enjoy Understanding the times: a strange postmodern world. The "normal" applies, however it is somewhat helpful with the terms....

You may find dividing the periods as such helpful from a philosophical perspective: Premodernity (Aquinas), Modernity (Hegel), and Postmodernity (Nietzsche) division of human history.


Reformed and Always Reforming,

Link Copied to Clipboard
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 466 guests, and 8 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Bosco, Mike, Puritan Steve, NSH123, Church44
992 Registered Users
ShoutChat
Comment Guidelines: Do post respectful and insightful comments. Don't flame, hate, spam.
May
S M T W T F S
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31
Today's Birthdays
Cdr McBragg
Popular Topics(Views)
1,885,527 Gospel truth