Forum Search
Member Spotlight
Posts: 147
Joined: August 2021
Forum Statistics
Forums31
Topics8,364
Posts56,564
Members992
Most Online4,295
May 22nd, 2026
Top Posters
Pilgrim 15,037
Tom 4,893
chestnutmare 3,466
J_Edwards 2,615
John_C 1,906
Wes 1,856
RJ_ 1,583
MarieP 1,579
Robin 1,080
Top Posters(30 Days)
Pilgrim 35
Tom 4
John_C 2
Robin 1
Recent Posts
"The king also himself passed over the brook Kidron."
by Pilgrim - Sun May 31, 2026 5:53 AM
"Take us the foxes, the little foxes that spoil the vines."
by Pilgrim - Sat May 30, 2026 5:23 AM
"Thou hatest wickedness."
by Pilgrim - Fri May 29, 2026 5:16 AM
"Whom He justified, them He also glorified."
by Pilgrim - Thu May 28, 2026 6:27 AM
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Hop To
#18761 Tue Oct 26, 2004 4:41 PM
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 201
janean Offline OP
Enthusiast
OP Offline
Enthusiast
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 201
I had a thought from reading some posts in the other post on infant baptism. Now what exactly makes a church apostate? how about a church just being in error? Do you think a church can be in error but not yet be labeled as apostate? Where does one draw the line? Or is there a line? Just curious about your thoughts here.

janean #18762 Tue Oct 26, 2004 5:11 PM
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,893
Likes: 49
Tom Offline
Needs to get a Life
Offline
Needs to get a Life
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,893
Likes: 49
I haven't given a lot of thought to your question. But my initial thoughts are: Does the error involve an absolute essential doctrine or not?

For example I am a credo-Baptist, but many on the Highway are paedo-Baptists. It is obvious that one of these positions are in error. However, since this matter is not an essential issue, I have no problem standing in unity with fellow Christians who disagree with me on baptism.

Tom


Last edited by Tom; Tue Oct 26, 2004 5:47 PM.
Tom #18763 Sat Jul 23, 2005 9:56 AM
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,615
Needs to get a Life
Offline
Needs to get a Life
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,615
Quote
Tom said:
I haven't given a lot of thought to your question. But my initial thoughts are: Does the error involve an absolute essential doctrine or not?

For example I am a credo-Baptist, but many on the Highway are paedo-Baptists. It is obvious that one of these positions are in error. However, since this matter is not an essential issue, I have no problem standing in unity with fellow Christians who disagree with me on baptism.

Tom
However, "if" your views on baptism make you deny other essential doctrines of the faith, (i.e. "salvation by grace alone," etc.) what do we then have (apostasy, heresy, mere error, etc.)? ALL doctrine is related and thus getting into the niddy gritty of the what we call less essential doctrines (if there is such a thing) may expose one's overall beliefs, misunderstandings of their beliefs, inconsistencies, errors, etc. "If" someone exalts the inconsistencies of a lesser doctrine to the expense of an essential doctrine, what do we then say?


Reformed and Always Reforming,

Link Copied to Clipboard
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 98 guests, and 14 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Bosco, Mike, Puritan Steve, NSH123, Church44
992 Registered Users
ShoutChat
Comment Guidelines: Do post respectful and insightful comments. Don't flame, hate, spam.
May
S M T W T F S
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31
Today's Birthdays
Cdr McBragg
Popular Topics(Views)
1,885,775 Gospel truth