I am sorry. To answer your question exactly, would involve too arduous a task at present, and I suppose it best under the present circumstances not to be much distracted from the words of Scripture itself. While I do as much as I reasonably can, I generally am not at great leisure to divert my attention to focus on a survey of the numerous writings which men have produced, as I find there are so many views and opinions that have been espoused over the years (and the best of these were written before Satan was loosed, so that there are many eschatological things which those generally more godly past generations could have no way of understanding very clearly).

Of course, anyone is welcome to challenge whatever view of Scripture I might express here from the Scriptures, and I have no problem if they themselves wish to borrow their arguments from other men (as I might sometimes do as well), so long as Scripture itself will be the basis of all. I find that there is a continual need to challenge and to correct myself from Scripture.

But in an attempt to provide at least something of an answer to your question; for now I will simply say that I think the reality to be that the greater part of Christian denominations have refrained from adopting an official eschatological position beyond what is foundational and is confessed by all Christians (i.e., that Christ is coming again to judge the world (or all men that ever lived); that there will be a resurrection of those self-same bodies in which men have lived and acted; that there are two places appointed for the bodies and souls of men, -a place either of eternal rewards of grace, or of everlasting punishments for sin (i.e., heaven and hell)…&c. -In these sorts of things all true Christians will agree). Whether or not one thinks it proper that most churches have not been more specific about Eschatology (and I myself could wish this were not the case), beyond the reason of mere sinful indifference, there does seem to be some valid reason for this as well, which I hope to touch upon a little later on.

But, while Christians and churches generally have allowed a rather generous degree of leeway regarding eschatological positions (so long as these are found within the bounds of orthodoxy), I would point out that in various of the less essential particulars (those areas of difference which are generally considered “negotiable,” such as the differences between post-mil, historic pre-mil, and a-mil viewpoints), I actually can say that I agree with all of these distinct camps of Christians, which is more than I could say if I were to fit more neatly into the Amillennial camp. Even so, my own views will not be winning any popularity contests, nor are they such as are likely to serve well for my personal self-advancement or ability to buy and sell in the world, or even in churches for that matter.

Listing the names of all of those with which I can agree in certain less-essential particulars would be an impossible task, since, as I said, I can agree in some particulars of these lesser things with all eschatological camps of Christians, where most people (whoever fit neatly into one of the distinct camps) cannot say so much. I will attempt to give you an example of what I mean by this:

As one who agrees with Amillennialism that the kingdom of Christ not only spans the whole gospel age, but is an everlasting kingdom, and as to its essence or nature, it is spiritual, being very much distinct from the kingdoms and nations of this world, as well, that the world would grow generally worse and apostasy increase toward the end (though not necessarily apparently so, nor necessarily in every time period), that throughout all of this time the saints must experience much tribulation;

…yet still further (as distinguishable from Amillennialism) I also can agree with classic Premillennialism in the supposition that there is a certain literal thousand years intended in Rev. 20 (although not a “1000 year kingdom” or “1000 year reign of Christ,” nor did this entail Christ’s being physically present on earth); that the Parousia (although not entailing a “rapture” (which comes later), but rather, Christ’s coming like a thief, at the end of which He (or at least his “sign”) will be seen in the heavens as he ascends again to the Father) and also the destruction of Babylon, both precede (are not the same event as) Christ’s return to judge the world finally, that there is a distinguishable tribulation period -“Jacob’s trouble” (i.e., the saints trouble) during the first part of that also distinguished latter-day “hour of trial which would come upon the whole world,” -out of the midst of which the saints will be removed (being gathered into one place -the regions of literal Jerusalem) and so “delivered” just before the destruction of Babylon…

And furthermore, as one who agrees with Amillennialism that nations as such, and civil government, are not in the Church (nor shall these ever be brought in), that Christian history, or our pilgrimage on earth would largely (or overall) be characterized by a cross which must be endured before the reception of a crown (i.e., the saints throughout most of history would not have the upper hand in worldly things);

…yet still further (as distinguishable from Amillennialism) I also can agree with Postmillennialism in the supposition that Christ will come again to judge the world finally only after the “kingdom and dominion under the whole heaven has been given to the saints” (although this actually is the “latter rain,” not the (already past) Millennium, and it will continue for about one hundred years until the general resurrection and final judgement. Also, it will occur only after a “full end” has been made of the nations -or of that present order of the kingdoms of this world and of men, so that the last nation standing in time will be the new Jerusalem, which, by means of the gospel will then be made to fill the earth).

If you (or anyone else reading this) find yourself still wondering as concerning a more specific answer to your question after November of 2023 (or even better yet, after June of 2026), then please feel free to ask me again (assuming this venue will still exist). Perhaps I will have a better or more suitable answer for you then. I am sorry as I realize this does not entirely answer your question, but I think this is the best answer I can give you for now.

But I would close with an encouragement (for whoever reads this) to some Scripture meditations. First, I think it would be good to meditate on whether or not Christ’s first coming was exactly or even very much at all according to the common and longstanding Messianic expectations of the Jewish Church. I think the fulfilment of prophecy is rarely (if ever) what people generally have expected it to be, and yet, who can deny the truth and accuracy of God’s Word in hindsight, once the fulfilment is accomplished? Prophecies concerning Christ’s first coming seem much more obvious to us who (all of our days) have had the advantage of looking back upon their actual fulfilment. I hope whoever reads these words will take some time to consider this, along with its implications concerning even the gospel Church and Eschatology.

Secondly, I suppose, when it comes to Eschatology, most of us probably have at least at some point, been guilty of not giving sufficient weight to what the following Scripture passages expressly teach concerning what the Church (and Christians) would be able to know throughout most of history (and this is where I am forced to acknowledge a certain degree of validity -whether I like it or not- in many churches never having adopted a more narrow official eschatological position):

“Then I Daniel looked, and, behold, there stood other two, the one on this side of the bank of the river, and the other on that side of the bank of the river. And one said to the man clothed in linen, which was upon the waters of the river, How long shall it be to the end of these wonders? And I heard the man clothed in linen, which was upon the waters of the river, when he held up his right hand and his left hand unto heaven, and sware by him that liveth for ever that it shall be for a time, times, and an half; and when he shall have accomplished to scatter the power of the holy people, all these things shall be finished. And I heard, but I understood not: then said I, O my Lord, what shall be the end of these things? And he said, Go thy way, Daniel: for the words are closed up and sealed till the time of the end.” Dn. 12:5-9 (My view is that the “time of the end” has reference to a final seven-years “time,” into the first part of which these “wonders” would extend, -which means this mystery would be opened up within about three and one-half years’ time at most (and probably especially within one years’ time). See surrounding verses for various other important details.)

“AND I saw another mighty angel come down from heaven, clothed with a cloud: and a rainbow was upon his head, and his face was as it were the sun, and his feet as pillars of fire [I take this to be a description of Christ in the Parousia]: And he had in his hand a little book open [signifying an initial or beginning of the unsealing of Scripture mysteries during the time of the Parousia]: and he set his right foot upon the sea, and his left foot on the earth, And cried with a loud voice, as when a lion roareth: and when he had cried, seven thunders uttered their voices. And when the seven thunders had uttered their voices, I was about to write: and I heard a voice from heaven saying unto me, Seal up those things which the seven thunders uttered, and write them not. And the angel which I saw stand upon the sea and upon the earth lifted up his hand to heaven, And sware by him that liveth for ever and ever, who created heaven, and the things that therein are, and the earth, and the things that therein are, and the sea, and the things which are therein, that there should be time no longer [i.e., time of delay, as concerning the judgement of Babylon (see the Greek)]: But in the days of the voice of the seventh angel, when he shall begin to sound, the mystery of God should be finished, as he hath declared to his servants the prophets. [or, when the seventh angel is about to sound (i.e., -the 7th trumpet, which, I would note in passing, is not said to be the “last trump”) the secret of God will be finished -or, made openly manifest (see the Greek)].” Rev. 10:1-7

I realize this is sort of a long answer for such a short question, but I hope it will prove helpful!