|
|
Posts: 15,038
Joined: April 2001
|
|
|
|
Forums31
Topics8,364
Posts56,564
Members992
| |
Most Online4,295 May 22nd, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 15,038 Likes: 283
Head Honcho
|
Head Honcho
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 15,038 Likes: 283 |
1. The NASB is hardly "hard to read", unless perhaps English is not one's primary language or they have never attended school.
2. The typical criticism of the NASB is that it wasn't translated from the TR (Textus Receptus/Received Text).
Personally, I don't consider the NASB to be a great translation, regardless of the source material used. There are many more that are worse which are far more popular, e.g., the NIV.
simul iustus et peccator
|
|
|
|
|
0 members (),
247
guests, and
17
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|