|
|
|
|
|
Posts: 706
Joined: May 2016
|
|
|
|
Forums31
Topics8,366
Posts56,566
Members992
| |
Most Online4,295
May 22nd, 2026
|
|
|
#54280
Fri Aug 18, 2017 9:42 AM
|
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,906 Likes: 1
Permanent Resident
|
OP
Permanent Resident
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,906 Likes: 1 |
What is optimal equilvalence? I know the NIV used dynamic equivalence. So the question is what is the difference between the two? Here is an extract from the opening paragraph on the website. HOW THE CSB WAS TRANSLATED
The CSB was translated using a methodology called Optimal Equivalence, which balances contemporary English readability with linguistic precision to the original languages. In the many places throughout Scripture where a word-for-word rendering is clearly understandable, a literal translation is used. When a word-for-word rendering might obscure the meaning for a modern audience, a more dynamic translation is used.
John Chaney
"having been firmly rooted and now being built up in Him and established in your faith . . ." Colossians 2:7
|
|
|
|
|
0 members (),
884
guests, and
8
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
