|

|
|
|
Posts: 147
Joined: August 2021
|
|
|
|
Forums31
Topics8,364
Posts56,564
Members992
| |
Most Online4,295 May 22nd, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 15,038 Likes: 283
Head Honcho
|
Head Honcho
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 15,038 Likes: 283 |
I saw somewhere on YouTube that Van Til's theology leads to Federal Vision.
So I just wanted to here your opinions on Van Til. 1. The claim that Van Til's theology leads to Federal Vision is proposterous. The FV heretics like to claim that Calvin and other 'notables' are allegedly not opposed to them.  2. Bahsen was quite solid except for his "Theonomy" views. His strong area was apologetics which is a refining of Presuppositional Apologetics from Van Til.
simul iustus et peccator
|
|
|
|
|
Entire Thread
|
Van Til and Federal Vision
|
Reformation Monk
|
Fri Jun 03, 2011 1:49 PM
|
Re: Van Til and Federal Vision
|
Pilgrim
|
Fri Jun 03, 2011 2:55 PM
|
Re: Van Til and Federal Vision
|
Reformation Monk
|
Fri Jun 03, 2011 3:36 PM
|
Re: Van Til and Federal Vision
|
Hitch
|
Sun Jun 05, 2011 1:15 AM
|
Re: Van Til and Federal Vision
|
Pilgrim
|
Sun Jun 05, 2011 1:33 AM
|
Re: Van Til and Federal Vision
|
Hitch
|
Sun Jun 05, 2011 2:25 AM
|
Re: Van Til and Federal Vision
|
Tom
|
Sat Jun 04, 2011 1:18 AM
|
Re: Van Til and Federal Vision
|
Reformation Monk
|
Sat Jun 04, 2011 1:07 PM
|
Re: Van Til and Federal Vision
|
Pilgrim
|
Sat Jun 04, 2011 2:30 PM
|
Re: Van Til and Federal Vision
|
Tom
|
Sun Jun 05, 2011 2:41 AM
|
Re: Van Til and Federal Vision
|
Pilgrim
|
Sun Jun 05, 2011 10:19 AM
|
Re: Van Til and Federal Vision
|
Tom
|
Sun Jun 05, 2011 4:24 PM
|
|
|
|
0 members (),
466
guests, and
8
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|