|

|
|
|
Posts: 3,466
Joined: September 2003
|
|
|
|
Forums31
Topics8,364
Posts56,564
Members992
| |
Most Online4,295 May 22nd, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 15,038 Likes: 283
Head Honcho
|
Head Honcho
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 15,038 Likes: 283 |
John, That's one of those questions which much speculation is to be found. Personally, I think Philip Mauro has a reasonable and worthy explanation. Here is a short quote from his full explanation which you can read here: The Opening of the Seals. The list of the tribes as given in Chapter VII presents a striking peculiarity. Although the company is said to be “of all the tribes of the children of Israel”, yet in the list that follows, the tribes of Dan and Ephraim are omitted altogether, and the number twelve is made up by including Joseph (along with Manasses his son) and Levi. This peculiarity is enough in itself to indicate clearly that we have here a symbolical and not a historical “Israel”. For while it might be possible, though not easy, to suggest a reason why Joseph and Manasses should be named instead of Ephraim and Manasses (who are never separated in any other enumeration of the tribes), it is not possible, on the theory that this is the literal Israel, to account for the complete omission of the tribe of Dan. All attempts to do so have conspicuously failed.
But if we regard this vision as being, like all the others, composed of symbols, then we may hopefully look for an explanation of the peculiarity referred to. My suggestion is that the desired explanation will be found in the meanings of the names of Jacob’s twelve sons. In His grace,
simul iustus et peccator
|
|
|
|
|
0 members (),
134
guests, and
15
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|