Pilgrim

I agree with the end result of what you are saying. However, there are Calvinist Churches that are "seeker sensitive".
This however, is negated by the fact that "seeker friendly" and "Calvinist soteriology" is at odds with each other.

I kind of look at the matter in a similar way, to how I look at a person like JI Packer. In that I can't understand how a person like him can be so correct when it comes to soteriology, but can still support ECT. Something just doesn't add up.
But then again, up until about 5 years ago I didn’t have a problem with the “seeker friendly” movement and I held to Calvinist soteriology.

You may not be aware of this, but the “seeker friendly” movement tries to convince everyone that the philosophy can be adapted to any Christian Church’s beliefs. Obviously some are buying into it.
At one time even the Church I attend bought into it, but (thank the Lord) some how the idea died out before it took a strangle hold.

Tom