|

|
|
|
Posts: 147
Joined: August 2021
|
|
|
|
Forums31
Topics8,364
Posts56,564
Members992
| |
Most Online4,295 May 22nd, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 15,038 Likes: 283
Head Honcho
|
Head Honcho
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 15,038 Likes: 283 |
Tom, going off-topic, asks: Rev 20:2 of course is not so obvious however. I am interested in what clues in the text & context you see that shows the reader what way 1000 years is to be taken. The "1000 years" found in Rev. 20 seems to some of us to be more than clear that it is not to be taken "literally", for to do so would create insurmountable problems in understanding many of the other things mentioned there, e.g., Was Satan bound with a "literal" chain? Was he cast into a "literal" bottomless pit (can you describe that from a literal hermeneutic)?, etc. Anyway.. this is ![[Linked Image]](http://www.the-highway.com/Smileys/OffTopic.gif) and thus if you want to continue with this issue, please begin a new thread. ![[Linked Image]](http://www.the-highway.com/Smileys/biggrinking.gif) In His Grace,
simul iustus et peccator
|
|
|
|
|
0 members (),
98
guests, and
14
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|